Tag Archives for What’s

Whats The Difference Between Betting On A Team With A -0.5 Line And The Money Line?

well for betting on a team with -0.5 is like betting on moneyline (1×2), but you also must take in consideration this handicap of -0.5. That means that at the final score (or half time score, depends on the bet you make), you take out the 0.5 points from that team.
as an example, if you bet on manchester united (-0.5) vs chelsea, in the case of a draw (let’s say 1-1), the bet is a winning bet if you placed your money on chelsea (as the final score with handicap would be 0.5 – 1)
if the final score is 1-0, the final score considering the betting handicap would be 0.5 – 1 = and you can see from these simple things who is in advantage and won the game
Moneyline betting is regular betting, where the final score (with no changes) is the one to be considered for settling the bets

What’s The Best Place For Blackjack Betting On The Internet?

Personally, my favorite place to for blackjack betting is Fortune Room Casino, but there are many great places for blackjack betting online. I recommend that you check out the casino bonus list at http://answerspot.blogspot.com/2006/06/c? There are plenty of excellent blackjack betting sites there and many are offering fantastic incentives for new players.

Whats The Worst Thing Happening In Sports Right Now?

the mike vick dog fighting scandal, the nba ref betting scandal, or barry bonds eventually breaking the home run record.
i think its the nba scandal is the worst, because if the accusations are true,it affects the whole league and not just one team like the dogfighting one. im a spurs fan, and for a while people were saying that the refs were on their side during their series against phoenix. i thought that they were just bitter fans. but now knowing this guy was one of the refs during the series, it makes me wonder if maybe something was up.
as for the other 2, i would say that the mike vick scandal is the next worse. although neither vick or bonds have been proven guilty for anything, i think any unbiased person with a right sense of mind can say that they are both guilty. but i say that what vick did was more serious. out of taking steroids and dog fighting, taking steroids is the lesser of 2 evils.
what do you guys think?

Whats The Play Of The Day In Sports ?

I thought about Oakland but whenever you bet oakland you got to hold your breath – I think best play is Texas/Toronto Under 9.5
Who has one better?
Thanks:)

If Pete Rose Bet To Win, What’s All The Fuss About? Wouldn’t Betting Enhance The Efforts Of A Team To Win?

As an owner of a racehorse, I have often bet on my horse to win (WIN only). In a game that sponsors and promotes betting, I have been known to share winning tickets with the jockey’s and trainers. It didn’t effect the performance of the horse, only that the jockey would give it that extra effort and thought about what the jockey was hired to do…WIN. So, Pete Rose has a gambling problem, isn’t that really his problem, being a gambler. Is the operative word—betting,..or that Pete Rose bet in a game that doesn’t promote gambling?
Do you agree with the following article by Jim Armstrong…?
Rose All But Slams Hall Door Shut
Betting on Reds Every Night Another Slap to Baseball
By JIM ARMSTRONG
AOL
Sports Commentary
Just when you hoped Pete Rose had disappeared for good, he pops up on a national radio program and attempts yet another stab at the truth behind his gambling addiction.
Eighteen years ago, when he accepted a lifetime ban from the game, Rose contradicted hundreds of pages of evidence compiled by the commissioner’s office and denied he ever bet on baseball.
Then, in 2004, when he was hawking his autobiography, he admitted he bet on games involving the Reds , a team he happened to be managing at the time.
Now Rose claims he bet on the Reds every night. No really, I’m not making this up. Rose told ESPN radio’s Dan Patrick and Keith Olbermann that, in a sport that plays 162 games, he bet on the Reds to win every night.
So it’s official then. Rose is even dumber than we thought. And trust me, nobody I know had him penciled in for a Harvard fellowship any time soon.
Why did he bet on the Reds every night?
„I bet on my team to win every night because I love my team,” Rose told Patrick and Olbermann. „I believe in my team. I did everything in my power every night to win that game.”
He bet on his team every night because he loved his team, believed in his team. Whew! For a while there, I thought it might be because he was a gambling degenerate.
Now that we know why Rose bet on the Reds every night — he loved his players, especially the ones who helped him cover the spread — the issue becomes this: Why would he tell a couple of talk-show hosts about it?

Whats The Most Addicting?

Between these choices, what would you say is pretty addicting. These here are all addictions:
Smoking
Playing too much Nintendo
Too much tv
Drinking/alchohol
Checking e-mail
Surfing the internet
Chatrooms
Myspace
Gambling
Eating too much ice cream/junk food snacks
Message boards like this website on yahoo answers
To me, my biggest addiction is the Internet and sometimes when I play too much Nintendo, I CAN NEVER STOP BECAUSE I AM SO COMFORTABLE ON THE COUCH AND I HAVE THAT ADDICTION PROBLEM! Whats your opinion on this people? Any comments about any of those addictions you may have?

If Pete Rose Bet To Win, What’s All The Fuss About? Wouldn’t Betting Enhance The Efforts Of A Team To Win?

As an owner of a racehorse, I have often bet on my horse to win (WIN only). In a game that sponsors and promotes betting, I have been known to share winning tickets with the jockey’s and trainers. It didn’t effect the performance of the horse, only that the jockey would give it that extra effort and thought about what the jockey was hired to do…WIN. So, Pete Rose has a gambling problem, isn’t that really his problem, being a gambler. Is the operative word—betting,..or that Pete Rose bet in a game that doesn’t promote gambling?
Do you agree with the following article by Jim Armstrong…?
Rose All But Slams Hall Door Shut
Betting on Reds Every Night Another Slap to Baseball
By JIM ARMSTRONG
AOL
Sports Commentary
Just when you hoped Pete Rose had disappeared for good, he pops up on a national radio program and attempts yet another stab at the truth behind his gambling addiction.
Eighteen years ago, when he accepted a lifetime ban from the game, Rose contradicted hundreds of pages of evidence compiled by the commissioner’s office and denied he ever bet on baseball.
Then, in 2004, when he was hawking his autobiography, he admitted he bet on games involving the Reds , a team he happened to be managing at the time.
Now Rose claims he bet on the Reds every night. No really, I’m not making this up. Rose told ESPN radio’s Dan Patrick and Keith Olbermann that, in a sport that plays 162 games, he bet on the Reds to win every night.
So it’s official then. Rose is even dumber than we thought. And trust me, nobody I know had him penciled in for a Harvard fellowship any time soon.
Why did he bet on the Reds every night?
„I bet on my team to win every night because I love my team,” Rose told Patrick and Olbermann. „I believe in my team. I did everything in my power every night to win that game.”
He bet on his team every night because he loved his team, believed in his team. Whew! For a while there, I thought it might be because he was a gambling degenerate.
Now that we know why Rose bet on the Reds every night — he loved his players, especially the ones who helped him cover the spread — the issue becomes this: Why would he tell a couple of talk-show hosts about it?

If Pete Rose Bet To Win, What’s All The Fuss About? Wouldn’t Betting Enhance The Efforts Of A Team To Win?

As an owner of a racehorse, I have often bet on my horse to win (WIN only). In a game that sponsors and promotes betting, I have been known to share winning tickets with the jockey’s and trainers. It didn’t effect the performance of the horse, only that the jockey would give it that extra effort and thought about what the jockey was hired to do…WIN. So, Pete Rose has a gambling problem, isn’t that really his problem, being a gambler. Is the operative word—betting,..or that Pete Rose bet in a game that doesn’t promote gambling?
Do you agree with the following article by Jim Armstrong…?
Rose All But Slams Hall Door Shut
Betting on Reds Every Night Another Slap to Baseball
By JIM ARMSTRONG
AOL
Sports Commentary
Just when you hoped Pete Rose had disappeared for good, he pops up on a national radio program and attempts yet another stab at the truth behind his gambling addiction.
Eighteen years ago, when he accepted a lifetime ban from the game, Rose contradicted hundreds of pages of evidence compiled by the commissioner’s office and denied he ever bet on baseball.
Then, in 2004, when he was hawking his autobiography, he admitted he bet on games involving the Reds , a team he happened to be managing at the time.
Now Rose claims he bet on the Reds every night. No really, I’m not making this up. Rose told ESPN radio’s Dan Patrick and Keith Olbermann that, in a sport that plays 162 games, he bet on the Reds to win every night.
So it’s official then. Rose is even dumber than we thought. And trust me, nobody I know had him penciled in for a Harvard fellowship any time soon.
Why did he bet on the Reds every night?
„I bet on my team to win every night because I love my team,” Rose told Patrick and Olbermann. „I believe in my team. I did everything in my power every night to win that game.”
He bet on his team every night because he loved his team, believed in his team. Whew! For a while there, I thought it might be because he was a gambling degenerate.
Now that we know why Rose bet on the Reds every night — he loved his players, especially the ones who helped him cover the spread — the issue becomes this: Why would he tell a couple of talk-show hosts about it?

Whats The Best Web Site To Bet On Sports?

if it’s horse racing, try twinspires.com

What’s The Payoff On 9-1 And What Is It On 9-2 Odds When Betting?

What is the difference between a bet of 9-1 and 9-2 ?

Ruletka